How we connect with books is impacted by our current world view. I first read Man’s Search for Meaning by Viktor Frankl when I was in high school. This book is a sobering account of the depths of human behavior. As a teen this helped me reframe my adolescent struggles as manageable, something I could find a way to deal with, even grow from. One idea I took away from the book at that time is, “there is honor in suffering.” I probably wallowed in my suffering at times, feeling like it was the honorable thing to do.
In rereading the book 40 years later, I realized I “misheard” one of the messages of the book. Dr. Frankl did not say there is honor in suffering. He said there is meaning in being your best self when facing unavoidable suffering. He stated:
“But let me make it perfectly clear that in no way is suffering necessary to find meaning. I only insist that meaning is possible even in spite of suffering—provided, certainly, that the suffering is unavoidable. If it were avoidable, however, the meaningful thing to do would be to remove its cause, be it psychological, biological or political. To suffer unnecessarily is masochistic rather than heroic.”
I wonder how often, as a young social worker, I suffered by working ridiculous hours, managing dangerous tasks alone, and not asking for help because I thought there was meaning in suffering itself. Now I understand that we have a responsibility to relieve suffering, your own or another’s, if possible. That translates to self-care, social justice work, trauma informed care for all – helpers and “clients.” I see the goal as reducing the need to be resilient, while supporting those times when it is unavoidable.